July 14, 2008 | Business Valuation, Court Decisions, Legal Perspective
This post is the second in a series dedicated to historical legal precedents on business valuation in Pennsylvania. The factual background for this case, Glosser Bros., is discussed in my post last week. This is part II: In addition to their argument that trial court should have considered actual stock transactions, the appellants in Glosser Bros. also complained about the expert testimony given by the dissenters’ accountant, who calculated the […]