The Court noted that there is no statutory definition of "income" for alimony cases in California, and it was unclear whether retained earnings could be properly categorized as "income" for alimony purposes....
In Blazer v. Blazer (No. DR 38292, Aug. 25, 2009), the California Court of Appeals discusses the excess earnings method and, in particular, the myriad ways to distinguish personal from enterprise goodwill....
The Seventh Circuit held that the salary earned by a CEO of a privately-held business (including a $17 million year-end bonus) was neither excessive nor a disguised dividend....
This series of posts contains summaries of Pennsylvania case law on the issue of double dipping in divorce. "Double dipping" occurs when an income-producing asset (such as a pension or business) is counted as marital property...
This series of posts contains summaries of Pennsylvania case law on the issue of double dipping in divorce. "Double dipping" occurs when an income-producing asset (such as a pension or business) is counted as marital property...